VILLAGE GIVES IN; RENTER WINS
WATER-BILL BATTLE
$260 BILL INCURRED BY PROPERTY
OWNER PROMPTED LAWSUIT
Tuesday, November 3, 1998
A tenant who
sued a southern Ohio village when it required her to pay the property owner’s
bill before turning on the water has won a cash settlement and forced Coal
Grove to change its water service policy.
Sally Mowery, 34,
and her daughter Amanda, 14, who won the out-of-court settlement with the Ohio
River village 110 miles south of Columbus, filed suit in federal court in
July.
Federal Judge
Susan Dlott last week approved an agreement in which the village of 2,300
residents will pay $2,590 to Mowery and $2,410 in fees and expenses for
Cincinnati attorney Steven C. Shane, who filed the suit.
Also part of the
settlement is a resolution passes Aug. 6 by the Coal Grove Village
Council that the village water department will not hold new tenants responsible
for unpaid bills incurred by prior tenants or property owners.
Mowery’s problems
began June 30 when she rented a house in Coal Grove and asked the
village to turn on the water.
She said village
employees told her that she could not have water service until a $260 water bill
incurred by the property owner was paid.
Mowery said she
and her daughter could not live in the house without water because both have
breathing problems that they sometimes treat by inhaling vapor from hot
water.
Mowery contacted
Southeaster Ohio Legal Services, which sent the village a letter asking that it
provide water service immediately.
The village did
not reply, and Mowery moved in temporarily with her mother in nearby South
Point, while Amanda stayed with her father in Ironton.
The legal services
agency referred Mowery to Shane, who had previous experience in dealing with
local government that required new water customers to pay debts left by previous
tenants.
“My perception is
that some small communities don’t do a very good job of complying with due
process and other constitutional protections that people are entitled to,” Shane
said by phone yesterday. “They sometimes
run roughshod over people’s rights and don’t weigh the consequences of their
actions. It’s basically an abuse of
power.”
The payment to
Shane includes $260 that he provided to get Mowery’s water turned on and $150
for court fees that he paid.
Shane said it is
not unusual in such cases for an attorney to advance the cost of a court filing
fee.
He said he put up
the money to pay the previous occupant’s water bill because “if I hadn’t done
that, she would not have gotten water.”
Mayor Glenn
Markins said shortly before the Village Council passed its resolution in August
that the village does not normally ask one tenant to pay a bill left by
another, and that the Mowery case grew out of a misunderstanding.
In her case the
unpaid bill was left by the property owner and not another tenant, he
said.
In the future, he
said, the village will provide water first and deal with questions about unpaid
bills later.
Neither Markins
nor Mowery could be reached yesterday for additional comment.
By Bob Dreitzler
Dispatch Staff Reporter
Copyright © 2001 Steven C. Shane Law Office
Last modified: December 26, 2001